Several months ago, the National Press Club commissioned the Neo-Angono Artists Collective to do an 8-foot mural on the topic of Press Freedom. Here’s is their final product:
It is a very compelling representation of the past and current state of Press Freedom here in the Philippines, what with freedom fighters Chino Roces, Marcelo del Pilar, Ninoy Aquino, Eugenia Duran-Apostol, Letty Jimenez Magsanoc and several others depicted in the painting.
A unique feature of the mural is the fact that the faces of the people in this man-on-the-street scene are media figures, press freedom icons and presidents of the National Press Club seen mingling with common and unnamed people. They are depicted or cast, not in their usual fighting stance, or projected stereotypically, but in a light and casual manner to suggest that journalists are like everybody else in the streets; that despite the threats to their lives for telling and reporting the truth, the journalists’ passion redounds to the same dream of ordinary citizens who want nothing more than to reap the benefits of transparency, public accountability and good governance, a society free from the clutch of poverty and corruption, and advancing press freedom – ideals which journalists fight for.
A similar distinct feature of the mural is that writers and journalists in various moments of historical juncture are (re)contextualized and reconfigured.
For this reason, it might initially escape belief and comprehension – and even solicit fun – that Joaquin “Chino” Roces is preventing a child (symbol for an emerging imperialist America) from shooting a bird resting on the street signage titled “Kalayaan”;Marcelo del Pilar rummaging through a garbage can for a cigarette stub and being furtively handed a letter by Mariano Ponce under a street sign labeled “La Solidaridad”; Eugenia Apostol smirking on the declaration of Martial Law; Epifanio de los Santos and Letty Jimenez-Magsanoc debating on the hot issues of the day; Antonio Luna, also an NPC hall of famer, being interviewed by journalists covering a rally of protesting journalists; or Benigno “Ninoy” Aquino listening pensively to Dr. Jose Rizal’s point on the issue of abduction and the “desaparecidos.”
However, when you take a trip down the NPC premises to see the real thing, you may notice some quite disturbing differences from the original work:
1) The erasure of a big portion of the newspaper held by the central figure, containing the statement of the International Federation of Journalists regarding the perceived effects of the anti-terror law on press freedom, and replaced by a hideous bird-monster in a cage;
2) The alteration of the headline of the newspaper Jose Rizal is holding from “Press Freedom Fighter’s Son Abducted” to “Press Freedom Fight Is On” and the defacement of Jonas and Edith Burgos’s pictures as well as the erasure of Jonas’s name;
3) The change of the tattoo on Andres Bonifacio’s left arm from the alibata “K” to a sappy red heart pierced by an arrow;
4) The erasure of the name of the National Union of Journalists of the Philippines from the banners of the rallyists;
5) The lengthening of the hair and beard of the figure identified as academician-columnist Prof. Randy David beside columnist Conrad de Quiros;
6) The addition of beard and mustache and the change of hair color from white to black of the pugo and balut vendor identified as columnist and Martial Law detainee Juan Mercado.
From “What Press Freedom?”, official statement of the Neo-Angono Artists Collective on NPC’s supposed defacement of the mural lifted from Tinig.com
*Thanks to Carlos Maningat, UP-CMC-SC Journ Rep, for forwarding the email with before and after pics to the UP Journalism Yahoo Groups
If this is indeed true, it begs the question: isn’t it ironic how an institution that allegedly fights for press freedom impedes on the rights of others? What does the NPC fear? Libel? Lawsuit? I didn’t think an institution such as the NPC is capable of censorship which it should so bravely abhor and fight against.
What now, NPC? What Press Freedom are you trying to talk about? Clear this up, please.










November 3rd, 2007 at 4:24 pm
[...] According to Blue Pencil Chronicles, the original mural was: a very compelling representation of the past and current state of Press Freedom here in the Philippines, what with freedom fighters Chino Roces, Marcelo del Pilar, Ninoy Aquino, Eugenia Duran-Apostol, Letty Jimenez Magsanoc and several others depicted in the painting. [...]
November 3rd, 2007 at 4:48 pm
[...] According to Blue Pencil Chronicles, the original mural was: a very compelling representation of the past and current state of Press Freedom here in the Philippines, what with freedom fighters Chino Roces, Marcelo del Pilar, Ninoy Aquino, Eugenia Duran-Apostol, Letty Jimenez Magsanoc and several others depicted in the painting. [...]
November 3rd, 2007 at 10:46 pm
[...] إعلام الفنانين قبل ذلك. مدونة تسجيلات قلم رصاص أزرق, قالت أن اللوحة الجدارية كانت: تمثل بقوة الماضي والحالة [...]
November 4th, 2007 at 1:08 pm
It’s interesting to note that these alterations were hastily made the day before it was to be inaugurated by Gloria Arroyo. hayy.
November 4th, 2007 at 1:15 pm
@Bikoy onga eh. Kunwari pa ang NPC na done “in good faith” daw. Sheesh!
And I have to agree with the Neo-Angono artists, kasi bukod sa figurative defacement ng mural eh ang panget panget pa nung pag-alter sa painting! Haha.
November 5th, 2007 at 3:57 pm
If this piece of art is indeed a paid art, I want to know who legally owns the “art”, and what are the provisions of the contract.
You mentioned earlier, that this group has been “commissioned” right.
I will give NPC the benefit of the doubt. Ilabas ang kontrata ng malaman natin kung nakasaad nga doon na walang pahintulot ang NPC na baguhin ang nasabing “Art”
Ikaw nga pala ang BlogHop feature blogger ko for today.
November 6th, 2007 at 12:36 am
@Isagani RX kung hindi ako nagkakamali, whether commissioned or not ang isang artwork, ang copyright at intellectual property right ay nasa kung sino pa rin ang gumawa ng artwork. Kaya nga ang mga painting kahit nabibili (ata) sa painter pa rin naka-copyright.
Ayon din sa kontrata (ayon sa report ng inquirer), “any alterations to the painting shall be mutually agreed upon.” Ayun.
Salamat sa pagfifeature! =)
November 6th, 2007 at 4:22 am
Siguro mas maganda kung naupo na muna silang dalawa at pinag usapan kung ano ang dapat gawin.
November 6th, 2007 at 10:07 am
it’s more than ironic. it’s pathetic. imagine an institution tasked to represent the supposedly brave mediamen bowing to some unseen forces. i believe that explains why most of the older journalists have shied away from the club.
November 27th, 2007 at 4:59 pm
Really good and really interesting post. I expect (and other readers maybe :)) new useful posts from you!
Good luck and successes in blogging!